Notes from the Field: Locally Acquired Mosquito-Transmitted (Autochthonous) Plasmodium falciparum Malaria — National Capital Region, Maryland, August 2023

Investigation and Outcomes

On August 6, a previously healthy resident of the Maryland National Capital Region was evaluated for a 7-day history of fever, malaise, and myalgias. In the months preceding symptom onset, the patient reported daily walks near home and an occurrence of a tick attachment but no international travel, blood transfusions, intravenous drug use, or other potential exposures to bloodborne pathogens.

Initial hospital laboratory testing revealed anemia, thrombocytopenia, hyperbilirubinemia, and intraerythrocytic parasites that raised concern for babesiosis or malaria. The patient was admitted to the hospital and, given the absence of international travel and the reported tick exposure, empiric treatment for presumed babesiosis^† was initiated. On August 9, a thin blood smear obtained at the time of admission was reported to show Plasmodium falciparum malaria with 3.2% parasitemia. Blood smear telediagnosis at CDC could not conclusively differentiate between malaria and babesia parasites from the images provided. In accordance with Maryland law, the smear and whole blood specimen were also submitted to the Maryland Department of Health (MDH) public health laboratory. Because the patient had no reported international travel and did have a history of tick exposure, as well as documented clinical improvement (reduction in parasitemia to 0.2%), the patient was discharged on August 10 with instructions to complete a 7-day babesiosis treatment course.^§

On August 15, testing at MDH public health laboratory identified P. falciparum using smear microscopy, the BinaxNOW Malaria rapid diagnostic test (Abbott), and 18S rRNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR). On August 18, CDC confirmed P. falciparum infection by 18S rRNA PCR; the Babesia spp. PCR test result was negative. Considering these findings, after completion of the babesiosis treatment, the patient received a course of artemether-lumefantrine.

MDH and the local health department first confirmed that all household members were asymptomatic and that the patient had not traveled internationally recently. Next, a public notice was issued, urging residents to avoid mosquitoes and to seek medical attention for malaria symptoms; Maryland clinicians and public health professionals were alerted to the case and provided recommendations to prioritize timely diagnosis, treatment, and public health reporting. To identify other potential malaria cases in local hospitals, active case finding was implemented. In coordination with the Maryland Department of Agriculture, mosquito surveillance was conducted by trapping Anopheles mosquitoes^¶ and applying multiple rounds of larvicide and adulticide. No geographically proximate malaria cases (i.e., within <5 miles [<8 kms] of the patient’s residence) during the preceding month were identified, and although Anopheles mosquitoes were present near the patient’s home, none of the 21 Anopheles mosquitoes tested at CDC was positive for P. falciparum. The source of the patient’s exposure remains unknown. To date, no additional autochthonous malaria cases of any parasite species have been identified in Maryland. This activity was reviewed by CDC, deemed not research, and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.**